Decade hub
1900s baby names
A name can be popular in the 1900s without belonging to the 1900s. This hub separates the two: the biggest names of the decade, and the names whose recorded history is concentrated inside it.
Expansion without a single new owner
The 1900s cover 1900–1909 and contain 4,285,123 recorded births: 2,927,552 girls and 1,357,571 boys, across 6,318 distinct names. Mary leads girls with 161,504 births and John leads boys with 84,590. The total reconciles exactly to the independent D1 anchor, which also reports Mary and John as the decade champions.
The top ten account for 16.25% of births and the top hundred for 56.76%, while the diversity score is 71.1213, the effective number of names is 504.69, and the concentration score is 0.5532. The profile therefore has more distinct names and a larger effective roster than the two preceding decades, even while the leading names remain prominent. These metrics measure distributional shape, not the causes of that shape.
Mabel is the girls’ ownership leader with 21,625 decade births out of 142,284 lifetime births, a 0.151985 decade share, and an ownership score of 91.6087; it ranks 30th in popularity. Will leads boys’ ownership with 3,246 decade births out of 45,952 lifetime births, a 0.070639 decade share, and an ownership score of 86.6070; it ranks 77th in popularity. The contrast with Mary and John shows why raw decade totals and decade ownership answer different questions.
The representative classroom is based on 1904: 20 girls’ seats and 10 boys’ seats, with 30 unique names and zero repeated names. The most repeated name still has only one seat, and the stored top-share display is 0.0333. This reconstruction describes the deterministic classroom rule used by the profile; it does not generalize to every school or community.
The strongest approved spelling family is Catherine: Catherine (22,006), Katherine (12,105), Katharine (1,246), and Kathryn (8,333) total 43,690 births. All four forms clear the 1,000-birth floor and the family clears 20,000; the forms are conventional spelling variants of the same name family. Sarah/Sara is also approved at 21,552 combined births. Cathryn is rejected from the Catherine family at 242 births because it fails the per-variant floor.
The source is the SSA national birth-name file, not a complete census of names or identities; counts under five are suppressed, and the source reports sex rather than gender. Lifetime totals and ownership use the 2025 vintage, so the scores can change when the source vintage changes. Nothing in these associations establishes why the 1900s distribution looked this way or makes a causal claim about naming behavior.
- Girls' popularity champion
- Mary 161,504 births
- Boys' popularity champion
- John 84,590 births
- Total recorded births
- 4,285,123
- Female births
- 2,927,552
- Male births
- 1,357,571
- Distinct recorded names
- 6,318
- Top-10 birth share
- 16.2%
- Top-100 birth share
- 56.8%
- Diversity score
- 71.1of 100 · 505 effective names
- Concentration score
- 0.6of 100
Decade ownership
Popularity measures size. Ownership measures identity. Some names remain popular for generations. Others overwhelmingly belong to one decade. The ownership score ranks names by how concentrated their recorded history is inside 1900–1909, weighted against how visible they actually were — adjusted so that rare names cannot win on a technicality.
It is a descriptive statistic about SSA birth records, not a verdict about culture. Read the full methodology.
Girls, ranked by ownership
The 25 highest ownership scores in the female eligible set.
| Rank | Name | Ownership score | 1900s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mabel | 91.6 | 21,625 | 142,284 | 15.2% | 1915 | rising |
| 2 | Myrtle | 87.6 | 19,691 | 136,486 | 14.4% | 1918 | endangered |
| 3 | Bessie | 87.1 | 23,984 | 170,140 | 14.1% | 1916 | endangered |
| 4 | Maude | 86.8 | 7,142 | 45,754 | 15.6% | 1888 | endangered |
| 5 | Gertrude | 83.5 | 23,607 | 177,100 | 13.3% | 1917 | endangered |
| 6 | Pearl | 82.1 | 20,913 | 159,088 | 13.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 7 | Ethel | 81.6 | 34,868 | 278,922 | 12.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 8 | Flossie | 80.8 | 3,410 | 21,808 | 15.6% | 1919 | declining |
| 9 | Mamie | 80.7 | 10,618 | 77,907 | 13.6% | 1919 | endangered |
| 10 | Blanche | 80.3 | 11,730 | 87,425 | 13.4% | 1917 | endangered |
| 11 | Beulah | 78.6 | 9,716 | 73,252 | 13.3% | 1916 | endangered |
| 12 | Minnie | 78.3 | 19,715 | 159,280 | 12.4% | 1916 | endangered |
| 13 | Viola | 77.8 | 16,559 | 132,993 | 12.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 14 | Bertha | 76.1 | 24,247 | 207,870 | 11.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 15 | Gladys | 75.7 | 30,285 | 266,718 | 11.4% | 1920 | endangered |
| 16 | Effie | 75.5 | 5,870 | 44,256 | 13.3% | 1919 | endangered |
| 17 | Fannie | 73.8 | 10,346 | 85,580 | 12.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 18 | Florence | 73.3 | 36,191 | 339,093 | 10.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 19 | Lucile | 73.0 | 4,566 | 34,887 | 13.1% | 1917 | endangered |
| 20 | Goldie | 72.8 | 4,966 | 38,553 | 12.9% | 1915 | rising |
| 21 | Gussie | 71.9 | 1,942 | 13,084 | 14.8% | 1918 | extinct |
| 22 | Agnes | 71.7 | 17,616 | 159,517 | 11.0% | 1918 | endangered |
| 23 | Nannie | 71.5 | 3,391 | 25,560 | 13.3% | 1920 | extinct |
| 24 | Mae | 70.3 | 12,711 | 114,835 | 11.1% | 1918 | stable |
| 25 | Hattie | 70.2 | 11,717 | 105,197 | 11.1% | 1918 | rising |
Boys, ranked by ownership
The 25 highest ownership scores in the male eligible set.
| Rank | Name | Ownership score | 1900s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Will | 86.6 | 3,246 | 45,952 | 7.1% | 1888 | declining |
| 2 | Ed | 80.6 | 1,814 | 26,205 | 6.9% | 1959 | declining |
| 3 | Charley | 78.7 | 1,633 | 23,974 | 6.8% | 1920 | stable |
| 4 | Claud | 75.5 | 811 | 10,893 | 7.4% | 1919 | extinct |
| 5 | Dock | 73.5 | 469 | 5,383 | 8.7% | 1920 | declining |
| 6 | Mose | 71.8 | 601 | 7,935 | 7.6% | 1919 | stable |
| 7 | Johnie | 70.3 | 1,276 | 20,930 | 6.1% | 1920 | endangered |
| 8 | Edd | 69.8 | 446 | 5,438 | 8.2% | 1919 | extinct |
| 9 | Booker | 69.5 | 809 | 12,230 | 6.6% | 1916 | rising |
| 10 | Pearl | 69.0 | 357 | 3,922 | 9.1% | 1918 | extinct |
| 11 | Sam | 68.6 | 6,161 | 127,234 | 4.8% | 1918 | stable |
| 12 | Clarence | 68.5 | 13,573 | 303,564 | 4.5% | 1921 | endangered |
| 13 | Elmer | 67.8 | 6,161 | 129,591 | 4.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 14 | Harry | 67.2 | 17,906 | 423,866 | 4.2% | 1918 | endangered |
| 15 | Rosevelt | 64.8 | 289 | 3,074 | 9.4% | 1933 | extinct |
| 16 | Charlie | 64.4 | 7,928 | 184,280 | 4.3% | 1919 | rising |
| 17 | Willie | 64.2 | 17,746 | 450,188 | 3.9% | 1947 | endangered |
| 18 | Homer | 64.2 | 2,915 | 60,912 | 4.8% | 1920 | endangered |
| 19 | Ollie | 61.8 | 952 | 17,626 | 5.4% | 1919 | rising |
| 20 | Fred | 61.5 | 13,076 | 343,655 | 3.8% | 1924 | endangered |
| 21 | Roosevelt | 61.0 | 1,790 | 37,661 | 4.8% | 1933 | endangered |
| 22 | Abe | 60.1 | 572 | 9,694 | 5.9% | 1917 | stable |
| 23 | Percy | 59.5 | 1,517 | 32,204 | 4.7% | 1921 | rising |
| 24 | Ora | 59.4 | 380 | 5,616 | 6.8% | 1919 | declining |
| 25 | Luther | 59.2 | 2,866 | 66,986 | 4.3% | 1922 | endangered |
Most owned by the 1900s
Top 25 by ownership score across both sexes; each row is tagged with its sex comparison set.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1900s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mabel | F | 91.6 | 21,625 | 142,284 | 15.2% | 1915 | rising |
| 2 | Myrtle | F | 87.6 | 19,691 | 136,486 | 14.4% | 1918 | endangered |
| 3 | Bessie | F | 87.1 | 23,984 | 170,140 | 14.1% | 1916 | endangered |
| 4 | Maude | F | 86.8 | 7,142 | 45,754 | 15.6% | 1888 | endangered |
| 1 | Will | M | 86.6 | 3,246 | 45,952 | 7.1% | 1888 | declining |
| 5 | Gertrude | F | 83.5 | 23,607 | 177,100 | 13.3% | 1917 | endangered |
| 6 | Pearl | F | 82.1 | 20,913 | 159,088 | 13.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 7 | Ethel | F | 81.6 | 34,868 | 278,922 | 12.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 8 | Flossie | F | 80.8 | 3,410 | 21,808 | 15.6% | 1919 | declining |
| 9 | Mamie | F | 80.7 | 10,618 | 77,907 | 13.6% | 1919 | endangered |
| 2 | Ed | M | 80.6 | 1,814 | 26,205 | 6.9% | 1959 | declining |
| 10 | Blanche | F | 80.3 | 11,730 | 87,425 | 13.4% | 1917 | endangered |
| 3 | Charley | M | 78.7 | 1,633 | 23,974 | 6.8% | 1920 | stable |
| 11 | Beulah | F | 78.6 | 9,716 | 73,252 | 13.3% | 1916 | endangered |
| 12 | Minnie | F | 78.3 | 19,715 | 159,280 | 12.4% | 1916 | endangered |
| 13 | Viola | F | 77.8 | 16,559 | 132,993 | 12.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 14 | Bertha | F | 76.1 | 24,247 | 207,870 | 11.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 15 | Gladys | F | 75.7 | 30,285 | 266,718 | 11.4% | 1920 | endangered |
| 4 | Claud | M | 75.5 | 811 | 10,893 | 7.4% | 1919 | extinct |
| 16 | Effie | F | 75.5 | 5,870 | 44,256 | 13.3% | 1919 | endangered |
| 17 | Fannie | F | 73.8 | 10,346 | 85,580 | 12.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 5 | Dock | M | 73.5 | 469 | 5,383 | 8.7% | 1920 | declining |
| 18 | Florence | F | 73.3 | 36,191 | 339,093 | 10.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 19 | Lucile | F | 73.0 | 4,566 | 34,887 | 13.1% | 1917 | endangered |
| 20 | Goldie | F | 72.8 | 4,966 | 38,553 | 12.9% | 1915 | rising |
Most popular of the decade
Top 25 by recorded 1900–1909 births across both sexes — size only, no ownership adjustment.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1900s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151 | Mary | F | 48.1 | 161,504 | 4,141,481 | 3.9% | 1921 | endangered |
| 82 | John | M | 46.8 | 84,590 | 5,182,633 | 1.6% | 1947 | endangered |
| 79 | Helen | F | 58.0 | 69,428 | 1,024,202 | 6.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 89 | William | M | 46.2 | 69,320 | 4,199,696 | 1.7% | 1947 | declining |
| 149 | James | M | 40.9 | 62,170 | 5,250,638 | 1.2% | 1947 | stable |
| 159 | Margaret | F | 47.0 | 57,919 | 1,264,774 | 4.6% | 1921 | endangered |
| 113 | Anna | F | 53.4 | 54,918 | 914,859 | 6.0% | 1918 | declining |
| 112 | Ruth | F | 53.6 | 51,010 | 836,122 | 6.1% | 1920 | endangered |
| 32 | George | M | 57.6 | 43,589 | 1,487,297 | 2.9% | 1921 | stable |
| 281 | Elizabeth | F | 35.8 | 41,708 | 1,688,757 | 2.5% | 1990 | stable |
| 219 | Dorothy | F | 40.4 | 39,112 | 1,112,231 | 3.5% | 1924 | endangered |
| 96 | Marie | F | 55.8 | 37,091 | 540,077 | 6.9% | 1920 | endangered |
| 18 | Florence | F | 73.3 | 36,191 | 339,093 | 10.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 139 | Charles | M | 41.8 | 36,184 | 2,434,659 | 1.5% | 1947 | stable |
| 58 | Mildred | F | 61.0 | 36,173 | 451,415 | 8.0% | 1920 | endangered |
| 254 | Robert | M | 34.0 | 35,849 | 4,849,730 | 0.7% | 1947 | endangered |
| 128 | Alice | F | 51.5 | 35,232 | 588,147 | 6.0% | 1921 | stable |
| 161 | Joseph | M | 39.9 | 35,173 | 2,669,490 | 1.3% | 1956 | declining |
| 7 | Ethel | F | 81.6 | 34,868 | 278,922 | 12.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 98 | Lillian | F | 55.1 | 32,519 | 475,028 | 6.8% | 1920 | declining |
| 15 | Gladys | F | 75.7 | 30,285 | 266,718 | 11.4% | 1920 | endangered |
| 26 | Edna | F | 69.9 | 29,832 | 295,116 | 10.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 28 | Frank | M | 58.4 | 29,046 | 915,978 | 3.2% | 1918 | endangered |
| 177 | Frances | F | 45.0 | 28,499 | 595,697 | 4.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 148 | Rose | F | 48.8 | 28,106 | 500,586 | 5.6% | 1917 | stable |
Popular but timeless
1900s births at or above the median of the pooled eligible set (both sexes) and adjusted concentration at or below its 25th percentile: big names whose recorded history spans many decades.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1900s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 254 | Robert | M | 34.0 | 35,849 | 4,849,730 | 0.7% | 1947 | endangered |
| 256 | Thomas | M | 33.9 | 21,783 | 2,358,576 | 0.9% | 1952 | stable |
| 305 | Paul | M | 31.4 | 12,636 | 1,398,293 | 0.9% | 1957 | endangered |
| 441 | Richard | M | 25.7 | 10,675 | 2,577,552 | 0.4% | 1946 | endangered |
| 526 | David | M | 22.9 | 8,619 | 3,676,654 | 0.2% | 1955 | endangered |
| 326 | Samuel | M | 30.6 | 8,149 | 820,196 | 1.0% | 2001 | stable |
| 628 | Betty | F | 21.0 | 7,921 | 1,001,238 | 0.8% | 1930 | endangered |
| 650 | Emily | F | 19.8 | 6,423 | 896,487 | 0.7% | 1999 | declining |
| 491 | Andrew | M | 24.1 | 6,277 | 1,329,454 | 0.5% | 1987 | declining |
| 684 | Nancy | F | 18.7 | 5,733 | 1,004,448 | 0.6% | 1947 | endangered |
| 610 | Michael | M | 19.6 | 5,220 | 4,426,753 | 0.1% | 1957 | endangered |
| 549 | Anthony | M | 21.8 | 5,043 | 1,488,042 | 0.3% | 1990 | declining |
| 573 | Daniel | M | 20.9 | 5,036 | 1,982,812 | 0.3% | 1985 | declining |
| 562 | Donald | M | 21.3 | 4,632 | 1,414,824 | 0.3% | 1934 | endangered |
| 556 | Kenneth | M | 21.6 | 4,579 | 1,283,974 | 0.4% | 1957 | endangered |
| 374 | Jesse | M | 28.8 | 4,559 | 432,428 | 1.1% | 1981 | stable |
| 453 | Peter | M | 25.4 | 4,375 | 589,588 | 0.7% | 1957 | stable |
| 667 | Sara | F | 19.2 | 4,210 | 436,193 | 1.0% | 1981 | stable |
| 693 | Maria | F | 18.1 | 4,174 | 566,111 | 0.7% | 1964 | stable |
| 720 | Rebecca | F | 17.1 | 4,052 | 755,992 | 0.5% | 1981 | endangered |
| 534 | Benjamin | M | 22.4 | 4,009 | 826,830 | 0.5% | 1989 | declining |
| 749 | Barbara | F | 15.8 | 3,999 | 1,436,695 | 0.3% | 1947 | endangered |
| 705 | Rachel | F | 17.7 | 3,974 | 573,957 | 0.7% | 1985 | endangered |
| 725 | Kathleen | F | 17.0 | 3,924 | 713,645 | 0.5% | 1951 | endangered |
| 708 | Christine | F | 17.5 | 3,901 | 586,465 | 0.7% | 1952 | endangered |
Unexpected results
Names whose popularity rank exceeds their ownership rank by 20 or more within their sex set — popular, but far less tied to the 1900s than their size suggests.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1900s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79 | Mabel | M | 47.6 | 103 | 409 | 25.2% | 1917 | extinct |
| 202 | Agnes | M | 36.8 | 78 | 465 | 16.8% | 1921 | extinct |
| 237 | Gertrude | M | 34.9 | 76 | 568 | 13.4% | 1920 | extinct |
| 238 | Rube | M | 34.8 | 77 | 612 | 12.6% | 1917 | extinct |
| 168 | Bessie | M | 39.4 | 93 | 737 | 12.6% | 1928 | extinct |
| 181 | Minnie | M | 38.1 | 91 | 787 | 11.6% | 1925 | extinct |
| 193 | Eino | M | 37.4 | 90 | 814 | 11.1% | 1915 | extinct |
| 236 | Mattie | M | 34.9 | 82 | 780 | 10.5% | 1928 | extinct |
| 145 | Elsie | M | 41.2 | 103 | 886 | 11.6% | 1927 | extinct |
| 239 | Tomie | M | 34.7 | 85 | 904 | 9.4% | 1919 | extinct |
| 282 | Ella | M | 32.3 | 78 | 901 | 8.7% | 2004 | declining |
| 101 | Bertha | M | 45.0 | 116 | 937 | 12.4% | 1932 | extinct |
| 220 | Eva | M | 35.8 | 91 | 1,007 | 9.0% | 1933 | declining |
| 122 | Clara | M | 43.4 | 114 | 1,016 | 11.2% | 1930 | declining |
| 229 | Lonie | M | 35.1 | 91 | 1,078 | 8.4% | 1921 | extinct |
| 107 | Son | M | 44.6 | 119 | 1,061 | 11.2% | 1982 | declining |
| 84 | Edna | M | 46.7 | 125 | 1,042 | 12.0% | 1927 | extinct |
| 275 | Bee | M | 32.6 | 82 | 1,023 | 8.0% | 1991 | extinct |
| 111 | Pink | M | 44.2 | 119 | 1,089 | 10.9% | 1919 | extinct |
| 332 | Lillie | M | 30.4 | 72 | 873 | 8.2% | 1929 | extinct |
| 285 | Lemon | M | 32.2 | 82 | 1,071 | 7.7% | 1927 | extinct |
| 259 | Hamp | M | 33.8 | 87 | 1,076 | 8.1% | 1920 | extinct |
| 321 | Hildur | F | 34.0 | 156 | 718 | 21.7% | 1915 | extinct |
| 123 | Guss | M | 43.4 | 118 | 1,136 | 10.4% | 1920 | extinct |
| 353 | Aurore | F | 32.3 | 145 | 693 | 20.9% | 1914 | declining |
The 1904 classroom
Apportion 30 seats from the actual 1904 national birth records and every seat carries a different name — no name was common enough in 1904 to guarantee a duplicate in a class of 30.
A statistical reconstruction of an average classroom, not an actual class record.
Spelling families
Conventional rankings separate spelling variants. This view groups manually reviewed variants to show their combined demographic footprint.
- Catherine family 43,690 births across 4 spellings — combined #6
- Sarah family 21,552 births across 2 spellings — combined #31
How these numbers are made
Every figure on this page is computed offline from SSA birth records with methodology decade-hub/v1.0.0, then served as a precomputed profile. Nothing is recalculated in your browser.
- Data coverage
- Decade 1900–1909; lifetime data through 2025
- Completeness
- Complete decade
- Methodology version
decade-hub/v1.0.0- Source version
ssa-national-2025- Generated
- 2026-08-14T03:32:54.323Z