Decade hub

1910s baby names

A name can be popular in the 1910s without belonging to the 1910s. This hub separates the two: the biggest names of the decade, and the names whose recorded history is concentrated inside it.

A mass decade with a narrower effective core

The 1910s cover 1910–1919 and contain 14,831,446 recorded births: 8,156,259 girls and 6,675,187 boys, across 15,258 distinct names. Mary is the girls’ champion with 478,636 births; John is the boys’ champion with 376,311. The independent anchor agrees on the total and both champions, including their counts.

Despite the much larger birth total, the distribution is more concentrated than the 1900s on the diversity measures: the top ten account for 18.02% and the top hundred for 54.54%; the diversity score is 66.1716, the effective number of names is 586.53, and the concentration score is 0.5703. The effective roster still grows in absolute terms because the decade is much larger, but the lower diversity score indicates a tighter distribution than the immediately preceding profile. This is a descriptive comparison, not an explanation.

Lucile leads girls’ ownership with 11,738 decade births out of 34,887 lifetime births, a 0.336458 decade share, and an ownership score of 84.8093; it ranks 137th in popularity. Woodrow leads boys’ ownership with 18,355 decade births out of 39,107 lifetime births, a 0.469353 decade share, and an ownership score of 87.2872; it ranks 67th in popularity. Mary and John remain the popularity champions, while Lucile and Woodrow are the names whose recorded histories are more concentrated in the 1910s under this scoring system.

The representative classroom uses 1914 and has 16 girls’ seats and 14 boys’ seats. It contains 30 unique names, with repeatedNames equal to 0 and the most repeated name at one seat; the stored top-share display is 0.0333. As elsewhere, this is an apportionment from one anchor year rather than a claim about the lived experience of every 1910s classroom.

The strongest approved family is Catherine: Catherine (65,823), Katherine (36,884), Katharine (2,854), and Kathryn (29,235) combine to 134,796 births. The forms are semantically defensible spelling variants and each clears 1,000 births; the family is well above the 20,000 combined threshold. Other approved families also clear review—Elizabeth/Elisabeth totals 118,972, Marian/Marion 60,132, Eleanor/Elinor 58,173, and Sarah/Sara 53,529—but none is larger than Catherine. Cathryn is rejected at 981 births because it remains below the per-variant threshold.

The SSA files suppress name-year counts below five and record sex rather than gender, so the long tail is necessarily understated and the category is not a complete account of identity. Ownership is calculated over recorded births through 2025 and is a descriptive concentration statistic, not evidence that a historical event caused a naming pattern. The profile can show what is present in the file; it cannot establish why the 1910s looked this way.

Girls' popularity champion
Mary 478,636 births
Boys' popularity champion
John 376,311 births
Total recorded births
14,831,446
Female births
8,156,259
Male births
6,675,187
Distinct recorded names
15,258
Top-10 birth share
18.0%
Top-100 birth share
54.5%
Diversity score
66.2of 100 · 587 effective names
Concentration score
0.6of 100

Decade ownership

Popularity measures size. Ownership measures identity. Some names remain popular for generations. Others overwhelmingly belong to one decade. The ownership score ranks names by how concentrated their recorded history is inside 1910–1919, weighted against how visible they actually were — adjusted so that rare names cannot win on a technicality.

It is a descriptive statistic about SSA birth records, not a verdict about culture. Read the full methodology.

Girls, ranked by ownership

The 25 highest ownership scores in the female eligible set.

Girls, ranked by ownership — 1910s decade ownership rankings
Rank Name Ownership score 1910s births Lifetime births Decade share of lifetime Peak year Status
1 Lucile 84.8 11,738 34,887 33.6% 1917 endangered
2 Mildred 84.5 123,998 451,415 27.5% 1920 endangered
3 Gertrude 81.5 49,565 177,100 28.0% 1917 endangered
4 Helen 80.4 248,154 1,024,202 24.2% 1918 endangered
5 Opal 76.4 20,386 73,539 27.7% 1918 rising
6 Thelma 76.3 57,011 225,460 25.3% 1921 endangered
7 Gladys 75.6 65,812 266,718 24.7% 1920 endangered
8 Florence 75.2 81,465 339,093 24.0% 1918 endangered
9 Lucille 73.8 56,147 232,571 24.1% 1920 stable
10 Agnes 73.1 39,255 159,517 24.6% 1918 endangered
11 Viola 72.9 33,076 132,993 24.9% 1918 endangered
12 Beulah 71.9 18,874 73,252 25.8% 1916 endangered
13 Ethel 71.5 63,662 278,922 22.8% 1918 endangered
14 Blanche 71.4 21,977 87,425 25.1% 1917 endangered
15 Edna 71.4 66,897 295,116 22.7% 1918 endangered
16 Ruth 71.3 173,675 836,122 20.8% 1920 endangered
17 Myrtle 70.4 32,432 136,486 23.8% 1918 endangered
18 Beatrice 69.9 44,515 194,920 22.8% 1921 endangered
19 Marguerite 69.4 22,658 94,022 24.1% 1918 endangered
20 Pauline 68.9 50,075 226,404 22.1% 1918 endangered
21 Bernice 68.0 40,346 182,130 22.2% 1921 endangered
22 Estelle 67.6 13,807 56,410 24.5% 1915 rising
23 Dorothy 67.4 207,475 1,112,231 18.7% 1924 endangered
24 Inez 67.3 16,342 68,353 23.9% 1920 endangered
25 Edythe 67.3 4,055 13,880 29.2% 1918 endangered

Boys, ranked by ownership

The 25 highest ownership scores in the male eligible set.

Boys, ranked by ownership — 1910s decade ownership rankings
Rank Name Ownership score 1910s births Lifetime births Decade share of lifetime Peak year Status
1 Woodrow 87.3 18,355 39,107 46.9% 1918 endangered
2 Hyman 63.9 2,778 5,858 47.4% 1916 extinct
3 Elmer 53.4 28,600 129,591 22.1% 1918 endangered
4 Irving 51.5 10,737 44,364 24.2% 1918 endangered
5 Wilbur 48.8 12,411 56,906 21.8% 1918 endangered
6 Chester 48.3 23,500 121,474 19.3% 1920 endangered
7 Isadore 48.0 1,980 5,714 34.7% 1916 endangered
8 Orville 47.3 7,901 35,065 22.5% 1920 endangered
9 Harry 47.0 65,874 423,866 15.5% 1918 endangered
10 Willard 46.9 15,364 77,658 19.8% 1915 endangered
11 Clarence 46.8 49,196 303,564 16.2% 1921 endangered
12 Harold 46.1 79,721 551,632 14.5% 1924 endangered
13 Walter 46.1 89,145 631,172 14.1% 1918 stable
14 Adolph 45.7 4,523 18,745 24.1% 1917 declining
15 George 45.4 176,609 1,487,297 11.9% 1921 stable
16 Isidore 45.4 1,357 3,421 39.7% 1919 rising
17 Frank 44.9 116,017 915,978 12.7% 1918 endangered
18 Albert 44.5 68,207 491,861 13.9% 1921 endangered
19 Homer 44.1 11,471 60,912 18.8% 1920 endangered
20 Herman 44.0 22,598 135,977 16.6% 1921 endangered
21 Lester 43.5 21,509 130,688 16.5% 1918 endangered
22 Emil 43.2 6,701 33,096 20.2% 1917 stable
23 Herbert 43.0 33,860 228,266 14.8% 1928 endangered
24 Francis 42.8 41,053 290,490 14.1% 1918 stable
25 Morris 42.6 12,484 71,000 17.6% 1918 endangered

Most owned by the 1910s

Top 25 by ownership score across both sexes; each row is tagged with its sex comparison set.

Most owned by the 1910s — 1910s decade ownership rankings
Rank Name Sex Ownership score 1910s births Lifetime births Decade share of lifetime Peak year Status
1 Woodrow M 87.3 18,355 39,107 46.9% 1918 endangered
1 Lucile F 84.8 11,738 34,887 33.6% 1917 endangered
2 Mildred F 84.5 123,998 451,415 27.5% 1920 endangered
3 Gertrude F 81.5 49,565 177,100 28.0% 1917 endangered
4 Helen F 80.4 248,154 1,024,202 24.2% 1918 endangered
5 Opal F 76.4 20,386 73,539 27.7% 1918 rising
6 Thelma F 76.3 57,011 225,460 25.3% 1921 endangered
7 Gladys F 75.6 65,812 266,718 24.7% 1920 endangered
8 Florence F 75.2 81,465 339,093 24.0% 1918 endangered
9 Lucille F 73.8 56,147 232,571 24.1% 1920 stable
10 Agnes F 73.1 39,255 159,517 24.6% 1918 endangered
11 Viola F 72.9 33,076 132,993 24.9% 1918 endangered
12 Beulah F 71.9 18,874 73,252 25.8% 1916 endangered
13 Ethel F 71.5 63,662 278,922 22.8% 1918 endangered
14 Blanche F 71.4 21,977 87,425 25.1% 1917 endangered
15 Edna F 71.4 66,897 295,116 22.7% 1918 endangered
16 Ruth F 71.3 173,675 836,122 20.8% 1920 endangered
17 Myrtle F 70.4 32,432 136,486 23.8% 1918 endangered
18 Beatrice F 69.9 44,515 194,920 22.8% 1921 endangered
19 Marguerite F 69.4 22,658 94,022 24.1% 1918 endangered
20 Pauline F 68.9 50,075 226,404 22.1% 1918 endangered
21 Bernice F 68.0 40,346 182,130 22.2% 1921 endangered
22 Estelle F 67.6 13,807 56,410 24.5% 1915 rising
23 Dorothy F 67.4 207,475 1,112,231 18.7% 1924 endangered
24 Inez F 67.3 16,342 68,353 23.9% 1920 endangered

Popular but timeless

1910s births at or above the median of the pooled eligible set (both sexes) and adjusted concentration at or below its 25th percentile: big names whose recorded history spans many decades.

Popular but timeless — 1910s decade ownership rankings
Rank Name Sex Ownership score 1910s births Lifetime births Decade share of lifetime Peak year Status
145 Thomas M 30.1 91,619 2,358,576 3.9% 1952 stable
179 Richard M 27.7 74,603 2,577,552 2.9% 1946 endangered
168 Donald M 28.3 57,001 1,414,824 4.0% 1934 endangered
297 David M 22.7 43,853 3,676,654 1.2% 1955 endangered
200 Kenneth M 26.1 43,248 1,283,974 3.4% 1957 endangered
569 Sarah F 27.2 38,120 1,098,498 3.5% 1982 endangered
267 Anthony M 23.8 35,627 1,488,042 2.4% 1990 declining
198 Samuel M 26.4 34,166 820,196 4.2% 2001 stable
379 Michael M 20.5 30,858 4,426,753 0.7% 1957 endangered
575 Laura F 27.0 30,549 801,811 3.8% 1964 endangered
318 Andrew M 22.3 28,152 1,329,454 2.1% 1987 declining
391 Daniel M 20.2 23,978 1,982,812 1.2% 1985 declining
701 Barbara F 21.2 23,704 1,436,695 1.6% 1947 endangered
390 Benjamin M 20.2 17,310 826,830 2.1% 1989 declining
730 Nancy F 20.1 17,283 1,004,448 1.7% 1947 endangered
720 Emily F 20.4 17,069 896,487 1.9% 1999 declining
697 Kathleen F 21.3 16,592 713,645 2.3% 1951 endangered
309 Gerald M 22.6 16,522 448,966 3.7% 1942 endangered
305 Jesse M 22.6 16,293 432,428 3.8% 1981 stable
650 Sara F 23.6 15,409 436,193 3.5% 1981 stable
711 Christine F 20.8 14,094 586,465 2.4% 1952 endangered
457 Stephen M 18.4 13,502 864,739 1.6% 1952 endangered
743 Shirley F 19.1 12,742 686,383 1.9% 1935 endangered
382 Wayne M 20.4 11,572 354,818 3.3% 1947 endangered
494 Alexander M 17.6 11,352 736,123 1.5% 1993 declining

Unexpected results

Names whose popularity rank exceeds their ownership rank by 20 or more within their sex set — popular, but far less tied to the 1910s than their size suggests.

Unexpected results — 1910s decade ownership rankings
Rank Name Sex Ownership score 1910s births Lifetime births Decade share of lifetime Peak year Status
291 Vlasta F 38.3 389 873 44.6% 1918 extinct
300 Toivo M 22.7 321 535 60.0% 1918 extinct
264 Reino M 23.8 359 711 50.5% 1916 declining
245 Woodroe M 24.6 381 784 48.6% 1918 extinct
176 Eino M 27.9 441 814 54.2% 1915 extinct
341 Moe M 21.7 327 733 44.6% 1916 rising
369 Helyn F 34.8 371 1,084 34.2% 1917 extinct
314 Ewald M 22.4 360 922 39.0% 1916 extinct
258 Masao M 24.1 400 1,018 39.3% 1918 declining
302 Mafalda F 38.0 444 1,279 34.7% 1925 extinct
327 Hertha F 36.9 451 1,453 31.0% 1916 extinct
413 Ova F 33.1 382 1,364 28.0% 1919 declining
403 Myer M 19.9 331 1,073 30.8% 1918 stable
406 Elfrieda F 33.3 401 1,487 27.0% 1917 extinct
385 Yoshio M 20.3 349 1,175 29.7% 1921 declining
259 Reinhold M 24.0 447 1,431 31.2% 1917 extinct
441 Attilio M 18.8 311 1,065 29.2% 1916 declining
426 Odie F 32.6 402 1,589 25.3% 1916 extinct
292 Goldia F 38.3 532 1,860 28.6% 1918 extinct
355 Hermina F 35.8 453 1,587 28.5% 1916 extinct
294 Clemens M 22.8 446 1,641 27.2% 1918 declining
371 Cleora F 34.7 451 1,712 26.3% 1918 extinct
413 Adolf M 19.7 358 1,394 25.7% 1918 extinct
408 Elberta F 33.2 431 1,750 24.6% 1916 extinct
202 Hildegarde F 44.6 719 2,326 30.9% 1915 extinct

The 1914 classroom

Apportion 30 seats from the actual 1914 national birth records and every seat carries a different name — no name was common enough in 1914 to guarantee a duplicate in a class of 30.

A statistical reconstruction of an average classroom, not an actual class record.

See the full 30-student roster

Spelling families

Conventional rankings separate spelling variants. This view groups manually reviewed variants to show their combined demographic footprint.

Explore all 5 spelling families

How these numbers are made

Every figure on this page is computed offline from SSA birth records with methodology decade-hub/v1.0.0, then served as a precomputed profile. Nothing is recalculated in your browser.

Read the methodology

Data coverage
Decade 1910–1919; lifetime data through 2025
Completeness
Complete decade
Methodology version
decade-hub/v1.0.0
Source version
ssa-national-2025
Generated
2026-08-14T03:32:54.323Z