Decade hub
1910s baby names
A name can be popular in the 1910s without belonging to the 1910s. This hub separates the two: the biggest names of the decade, and the names whose recorded history is concentrated inside it.
A mass decade with a narrower effective core
The 1910s cover 1910–1919 and contain 14,831,446 recorded births: 8,156,259 girls and 6,675,187 boys, across 15,258 distinct names. Mary is the girls’ champion with 478,636 births; John is the boys’ champion with 376,311. The independent anchor agrees on the total and both champions, including their counts.
Despite the much larger birth total, the distribution is more concentrated than the 1900s on the diversity measures: the top ten account for 18.02% and the top hundred for 54.54%; the diversity score is 66.1716, the effective number of names is 586.53, and the concentration score is 0.5703. The effective roster still grows in absolute terms because the decade is much larger, but the lower diversity score indicates a tighter distribution than the immediately preceding profile. This is a descriptive comparison, not an explanation.
Lucile leads girls’ ownership with 11,738 decade births out of 34,887 lifetime births, a 0.336458 decade share, and an ownership score of 84.8093; it ranks 137th in popularity. Woodrow leads boys’ ownership with 18,355 decade births out of 39,107 lifetime births, a 0.469353 decade share, and an ownership score of 87.2872; it ranks 67th in popularity. Mary and John remain the popularity champions, while Lucile and Woodrow are the names whose recorded histories are more concentrated in the 1910s under this scoring system.
The representative classroom uses 1914 and has 16 girls’ seats and 14 boys’ seats. It contains 30 unique names, with repeatedNames equal to 0 and the most repeated name at one seat; the stored top-share display is 0.0333. As elsewhere, this is an apportionment from one anchor year rather than a claim about the lived experience of every 1910s classroom.
The strongest approved family is Catherine: Catherine (65,823), Katherine (36,884), Katharine (2,854), and Kathryn (29,235) combine to 134,796 births. The forms are semantically defensible spelling variants and each clears 1,000 births; the family is well above the 20,000 combined threshold. Other approved families also clear review—Elizabeth/Elisabeth totals 118,972, Marian/Marion 60,132, Eleanor/Elinor 58,173, and Sarah/Sara 53,529—but none is larger than Catherine. Cathryn is rejected at 981 births because it remains below the per-variant threshold.
The SSA files suppress name-year counts below five and record sex rather than gender, so the long tail is necessarily understated and the category is not a complete account of identity. Ownership is calculated over recorded births through 2025 and is a descriptive concentration statistic, not evidence that a historical event caused a naming pattern. The profile can show what is present in the file; it cannot establish why the 1910s looked this way.
- Girls' popularity champion
- Mary 478,636 births
- Boys' popularity champion
- John 376,311 births
- Total recorded births
- 14,831,446
- Female births
- 8,156,259
- Male births
- 6,675,187
- Distinct recorded names
- 15,258
- Top-10 birth share
- 18.0%
- Top-100 birth share
- 54.5%
- Diversity score
- 66.2of 100 · 587 effective names
- Concentration score
- 0.6of 100
Decade ownership
Popularity measures size. Ownership measures identity. Some names remain popular for generations. Others overwhelmingly belong to one decade. The ownership score ranks names by how concentrated their recorded history is inside 1910–1919, weighted against how visible they actually were — adjusted so that rare names cannot win on a technicality.
It is a descriptive statistic about SSA birth records, not a verdict about culture. Read the full methodology.
Girls, ranked by ownership
The 25 highest ownership scores in the female eligible set.
| Rank | Name | Ownership score | 1910s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lucile | 84.8 | 11,738 | 34,887 | 33.6% | 1917 | endangered |
| 2 | Mildred | 84.5 | 123,998 | 451,415 | 27.5% | 1920 | endangered |
| 3 | Gertrude | 81.5 | 49,565 | 177,100 | 28.0% | 1917 | endangered |
| 4 | Helen | 80.4 | 248,154 | 1,024,202 | 24.2% | 1918 | endangered |
| 5 | Opal | 76.4 | 20,386 | 73,539 | 27.7% | 1918 | rising |
| 6 | Thelma | 76.3 | 57,011 | 225,460 | 25.3% | 1921 | endangered |
| 7 | Gladys | 75.6 | 65,812 | 266,718 | 24.7% | 1920 | endangered |
| 8 | Florence | 75.2 | 81,465 | 339,093 | 24.0% | 1918 | endangered |
| 9 | Lucille | 73.8 | 56,147 | 232,571 | 24.1% | 1920 | stable |
| 10 | Agnes | 73.1 | 39,255 | 159,517 | 24.6% | 1918 | endangered |
| 11 | Viola | 72.9 | 33,076 | 132,993 | 24.9% | 1918 | endangered |
| 12 | Beulah | 71.9 | 18,874 | 73,252 | 25.8% | 1916 | endangered |
| 13 | Ethel | 71.5 | 63,662 | 278,922 | 22.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 14 | Blanche | 71.4 | 21,977 | 87,425 | 25.1% | 1917 | endangered |
| 15 | Edna | 71.4 | 66,897 | 295,116 | 22.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 16 | Ruth | 71.3 | 173,675 | 836,122 | 20.8% | 1920 | endangered |
| 17 | Myrtle | 70.4 | 32,432 | 136,486 | 23.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 18 | Beatrice | 69.9 | 44,515 | 194,920 | 22.8% | 1921 | endangered |
| 19 | Marguerite | 69.4 | 22,658 | 94,022 | 24.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 20 | Pauline | 68.9 | 50,075 | 226,404 | 22.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 21 | Bernice | 68.0 | 40,346 | 182,130 | 22.2% | 1921 | endangered |
| 22 | Estelle | 67.6 | 13,807 | 56,410 | 24.5% | 1915 | rising |
| 23 | Dorothy | 67.4 | 207,475 | 1,112,231 | 18.7% | 1924 | endangered |
| 24 | Inez | 67.3 | 16,342 | 68,353 | 23.9% | 1920 | endangered |
| 25 | Edythe | 67.3 | 4,055 | 13,880 | 29.2% | 1918 | endangered |
Boys, ranked by ownership
The 25 highest ownership scores in the male eligible set.
| Rank | Name | Ownership score | 1910s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woodrow | 87.3 | 18,355 | 39,107 | 46.9% | 1918 | endangered |
| 2 | Hyman | 63.9 | 2,778 | 5,858 | 47.4% | 1916 | extinct |
| 3 | Elmer | 53.4 | 28,600 | 129,591 | 22.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 4 | Irving | 51.5 | 10,737 | 44,364 | 24.2% | 1918 | endangered |
| 5 | Wilbur | 48.8 | 12,411 | 56,906 | 21.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 6 | Chester | 48.3 | 23,500 | 121,474 | 19.3% | 1920 | endangered |
| 7 | Isadore | 48.0 | 1,980 | 5,714 | 34.7% | 1916 | endangered |
| 8 | Orville | 47.3 | 7,901 | 35,065 | 22.5% | 1920 | endangered |
| 9 | Harry | 47.0 | 65,874 | 423,866 | 15.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 10 | Willard | 46.9 | 15,364 | 77,658 | 19.8% | 1915 | endangered |
| 11 | Clarence | 46.8 | 49,196 | 303,564 | 16.2% | 1921 | endangered |
| 12 | Harold | 46.1 | 79,721 | 551,632 | 14.5% | 1924 | endangered |
| 13 | Walter | 46.1 | 89,145 | 631,172 | 14.1% | 1918 | stable |
| 14 | Adolph | 45.7 | 4,523 | 18,745 | 24.1% | 1917 | declining |
| 15 | George | 45.4 | 176,609 | 1,487,297 | 11.9% | 1921 | stable |
| 16 | Isidore | 45.4 | 1,357 | 3,421 | 39.7% | 1919 | rising |
| 17 | Frank | 44.9 | 116,017 | 915,978 | 12.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 18 | Albert | 44.5 | 68,207 | 491,861 | 13.9% | 1921 | endangered |
| 19 | Homer | 44.1 | 11,471 | 60,912 | 18.8% | 1920 | endangered |
| 20 | Herman | 44.0 | 22,598 | 135,977 | 16.6% | 1921 | endangered |
| 21 | Lester | 43.5 | 21,509 | 130,688 | 16.5% | 1918 | endangered |
| 22 | Emil | 43.2 | 6,701 | 33,096 | 20.2% | 1917 | stable |
| 23 | Herbert | 43.0 | 33,860 | 228,266 | 14.8% | 1928 | endangered |
| 24 | Francis | 42.8 | 41,053 | 290,490 | 14.1% | 1918 | stable |
| 25 | Morris | 42.6 | 12,484 | 71,000 | 17.6% | 1918 | endangered |
Most owned by the 1910s
Top 25 by ownership score across both sexes; each row is tagged with its sex comparison set.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1910s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woodrow | M | 87.3 | 18,355 | 39,107 | 46.9% | 1918 | endangered |
| 1 | Lucile | F | 84.8 | 11,738 | 34,887 | 33.6% | 1917 | endangered |
| 2 | Mildred | F | 84.5 | 123,998 | 451,415 | 27.5% | 1920 | endangered |
| 3 | Gertrude | F | 81.5 | 49,565 | 177,100 | 28.0% | 1917 | endangered |
| 4 | Helen | F | 80.4 | 248,154 | 1,024,202 | 24.2% | 1918 | endangered |
| 5 | Opal | F | 76.4 | 20,386 | 73,539 | 27.7% | 1918 | rising |
| 6 | Thelma | F | 76.3 | 57,011 | 225,460 | 25.3% | 1921 | endangered |
| 7 | Gladys | F | 75.6 | 65,812 | 266,718 | 24.7% | 1920 | endangered |
| 8 | Florence | F | 75.2 | 81,465 | 339,093 | 24.0% | 1918 | endangered |
| 9 | Lucille | F | 73.8 | 56,147 | 232,571 | 24.1% | 1920 | stable |
| 10 | Agnes | F | 73.1 | 39,255 | 159,517 | 24.6% | 1918 | endangered |
| 11 | Viola | F | 72.9 | 33,076 | 132,993 | 24.9% | 1918 | endangered |
| 12 | Beulah | F | 71.9 | 18,874 | 73,252 | 25.8% | 1916 | endangered |
| 13 | Ethel | F | 71.5 | 63,662 | 278,922 | 22.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 14 | Blanche | F | 71.4 | 21,977 | 87,425 | 25.1% | 1917 | endangered |
| 15 | Edna | F | 71.4 | 66,897 | 295,116 | 22.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 16 | Ruth | F | 71.3 | 173,675 | 836,122 | 20.8% | 1920 | endangered |
| 17 | Myrtle | F | 70.4 | 32,432 | 136,486 | 23.8% | 1918 | endangered |
| 18 | Beatrice | F | 69.9 | 44,515 | 194,920 | 22.8% | 1921 | endangered |
| 19 | Marguerite | F | 69.4 | 22,658 | 94,022 | 24.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 20 | Pauline | F | 68.9 | 50,075 | 226,404 | 22.1% | 1918 | endangered |
| 21 | Bernice | F | 68.0 | 40,346 | 182,130 | 22.2% | 1921 | endangered |
| 22 | Estelle | F | 67.6 | 13,807 | 56,410 | 24.5% | 1915 | rising |
| 23 | Dorothy | F | 67.4 | 207,475 | 1,112,231 | 18.7% | 1924 | endangered |
| 24 | Inez | F | 67.3 | 16,342 | 68,353 | 23.9% | 1920 | endangered |
Most popular of the decade
Top 25 by recorded 1910–1919 births across both sexes — size only, no ownership adjustment.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1910s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98 | Mary | F | 55.3 | 478,636 | 4,141,481 | 11.6% | 1921 | endangered |
| 31 | John | M | 41.4 | 376,311 | 5,182,633 | 7.3% | 1947 | endangered |
| 38 | William | M | 40.4 | 303,017 | 4,199,696 | 7.2% | 1947 | declining |
| 68 | James | M | 36.8 | 275,070 | 5,250,638 | 5.2% | 1947 | stable |
| 4 | Helen | F | 80.4 | 248,154 | 1,024,202 | 24.2% | 1918 | endangered |
| 75 | Robert | M | 35.8 | 239,185 | 4,849,730 | 4.9% | 1947 | endangered |
| 23 | Dorothy | F | 67.4 | 207,475 | 1,112,231 | 18.7% | 1924 | endangered |
| 59 | Margaret | F | 58.9 | 189,234 | 1,264,774 | 15.0% | 1921 | endangered |
| 65 | Joseph | M | 37.4 | 179,300 | 2,669,490 | 6.7% | 1956 | declining |
| 15 | George | M | 45.4 | 176,609 | 1,487,297 | 11.9% | 1921 | stable |
| 16 | Ruth | F | 71.3 | 173,675 | 836,122 | 20.8% | 1920 | endangered |
| 60 | Charles | M | 37.9 | 173,535 | 2,434,659 | 7.1% | 1947 | stable |
| 37 | Edward | M | 40.5 | 125,720 | 1,303,594 | 9.6% | 1924 | endangered |
| 2 | Mildred | F | 84.5 | 123,998 | 451,415 | 27.5% | 1920 | endangered |
| 116 | Anna | F | 52.7 | 118,998 | 914,859 | 13.0% | 1918 | declining |
| 273 | Elizabeth | F | 39.3 | 116,811 | 1,688,757 | 6.9% | 1990 | stable |
| 17 | Frank | M | 44.9 | 116,017 | 915,978 | 12.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 40 | Frances | F | 62.6 | 105,599 | 595,697 | 17.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 102 | Virginia | F | 54.9 | 94,322 | 652,959 | 14.4% | 1922 | endangered |
| 50 | Marie | F | 60.5 | 92,086 | 540,077 | 17.1% | 1920 | endangered |
| 145 | Thomas | M | 30.1 | 91,619 | 2,358,576 | 3.9% | 1952 | stable |
| 106 | Evelyn | F | 54.5 | 91,492 | 639,756 | 14.3% | 1921 | stable |
| 13 | Walter | M | 46.1 | 89,145 | 631,172 | 14.1% | 1918 | stable |
| 103 | Alice | F | 54.9 | 85,866 | 588,147 | 14.6% | 1921 | stable |
| 8 | Florence | F | 75.2 | 81,465 | 339,093 | 24.0% | 1918 | endangered |
Popular but timeless
1910s births at or above the median of the pooled eligible set (both sexes) and adjusted concentration at or below its 25th percentile: big names whose recorded history spans many decades.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1910s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 145 | Thomas | M | 30.1 | 91,619 | 2,358,576 | 3.9% | 1952 | stable |
| 179 | Richard | M | 27.7 | 74,603 | 2,577,552 | 2.9% | 1946 | endangered |
| 168 | Donald | M | 28.3 | 57,001 | 1,414,824 | 4.0% | 1934 | endangered |
| 297 | David | M | 22.7 | 43,853 | 3,676,654 | 1.2% | 1955 | endangered |
| 200 | Kenneth | M | 26.1 | 43,248 | 1,283,974 | 3.4% | 1957 | endangered |
| 569 | Sarah | F | 27.2 | 38,120 | 1,098,498 | 3.5% | 1982 | endangered |
| 267 | Anthony | M | 23.8 | 35,627 | 1,488,042 | 2.4% | 1990 | declining |
| 198 | Samuel | M | 26.4 | 34,166 | 820,196 | 4.2% | 2001 | stable |
| 379 | Michael | M | 20.5 | 30,858 | 4,426,753 | 0.7% | 1957 | endangered |
| 575 | Laura | F | 27.0 | 30,549 | 801,811 | 3.8% | 1964 | endangered |
| 318 | Andrew | M | 22.3 | 28,152 | 1,329,454 | 2.1% | 1987 | declining |
| 391 | Daniel | M | 20.2 | 23,978 | 1,982,812 | 1.2% | 1985 | declining |
| 701 | Barbara | F | 21.2 | 23,704 | 1,436,695 | 1.6% | 1947 | endangered |
| 390 | Benjamin | M | 20.2 | 17,310 | 826,830 | 2.1% | 1989 | declining |
| 730 | Nancy | F | 20.1 | 17,283 | 1,004,448 | 1.7% | 1947 | endangered |
| 720 | Emily | F | 20.4 | 17,069 | 896,487 | 1.9% | 1999 | declining |
| 697 | Kathleen | F | 21.3 | 16,592 | 713,645 | 2.3% | 1951 | endangered |
| 309 | Gerald | M | 22.6 | 16,522 | 448,966 | 3.7% | 1942 | endangered |
| 305 | Jesse | M | 22.6 | 16,293 | 432,428 | 3.8% | 1981 | stable |
| 650 | Sara | F | 23.6 | 15,409 | 436,193 | 3.5% | 1981 | stable |
| 711 | Christine | F | 20.8 | 14,094 | 586,465 | 2.4% | 1952 | endangered |
| 457 | Stephen | M | 18.4 | 13,502 | 864,739 | 1.6% | 1952 | endangered |
| 743 | Shirley | F | 19.1 | 12,742 | 686,383 | 1.9% | 1935 | endangered |
| 382 | Wayne | M | 20.4 | 11,572 | 354,818 | 3.3% | 1947 | endangered |
| 494 | Alexander | M | 17.6 | 11,352 | 736,123 | 1.5% | 1993 | declining |
Unexpected results
Names whose popularity rank exceeds their ownership rank by 20 or more within their sex set — popular, but far less tied to the 1910s than their size suggests.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1910s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 291 | Vlasta | F | 38.3 | 389 | 873 | 44.6% | 1918 | extinct |
| 300 | Toivo | M | 22.7 | 321 | 535 | 60.0% | 1918 | extinct |
| 264 | Reino | M | 23.8 | 359 | 711 | 50.5% | 1916 | declining |
| 245 | Woodroe | M | 24.6 | 381 | 784 | 48.6% | 1918 | extinct |
| 176 | Eino | M | 27.9 | 441 | 814 | 54.2% | 1915 | extinct |
| 341 | Moe | M | 21.7 | 327 | 733 | 44.6% | 1916 | rising |
| 369 | Helyn | F | 34.8 | 371 | 1,084 | 34.2% | 1917 | extinct |
| 314 | Ewald | M | 22.4 | 360 | 922 | 39.0% | 1916 | extinct |
| 258 | Masao | M | 24.1 | 400 | 1,018 | 39.3% | 1918 | declining |
| 302 | Mafalda | F | 38.0 | 444 | 1,279 | 34.7% | 1925 | extinct |
| 327 | Hertha | F | 36.9 | 451 | 1,453 | 31.0% | 1916 | extinct |
| 413 | Ova | F | 33.1 | 382 | 1,364 | 28.0% | 1919 | declining |
| 403 | Myer | M | 19.9 | 331 | 1,073 | 30.8% | 1918 | stable |
| 406 | Elfrieda | F | 33.3 | 401 | 1,487 | 27.0% | 1917 | extinct |
| 385 | Yoshio | M | 20.3 | 349 | 1,175 | 29.7% | 1921 | declining |
| 259 | Reinhold | M | 24.0 | 447 | 1,431 | 31.2% | 1917 | extinct |
| 441 | Attilio | M | 18.8 | 311 | 1,065 | 29.2% | 1916 | declining |
| 426 | Odie | F | 32.6 | 402 | 1,589 | 25.3% | 1916 | extinct |
| 292 | Goldia | F | 38.3 | 532 | 1,860 | 28.6% | 1918 | extinct |
| 355 | Hermina | F | 35.8 | 453 | 1,587 | 28.5% | 1916 | extinct |
| 294 | Clemens | M | 22.8 | 446 | 1,641 | 27.2% | 1918 | declining |
| 371 | Cleora | F | 34.7 | 451 | 1,712 | 26.3% | 1918 | extinct |
| 413 | Adolf | M | 19.7 | 358 | 1,394 | 25.7% | 1918 | extinct |
| 408 | Elberta | F | 33.2 | 431 | 1,750 | 24.6% | 1916 | extinct |
| 202 | Hildegarde | F | 44.6 | 719 | 2,326 | 30.9% | 1915 | extinct |
The 1914 classroom
Apportion 30 seats from the actual 1914 national birth records and every seat carries a different name — no name was common enough in 1914 to guarantee a duplicate in a class of 30.
A statistical reconstruction of an average classroom, not an actual class record.
Spelling families
Conventional rankings separate spelling variants. This view groups manually reviewed variants to show their combined demographic footprint.
- Catherine family 134,796 births across 4 spellings — combined #6
- Elizabeth family 118,972 births across 2 spellings — combined #8
- Marian family 60,132 births across 2 spellings — combined #25
- Eleanor family 58,173 births across 2 spellings — combined #26
- Sarah family 53,529 births across 2 spellings — combined #32
How these numbers are made
Every figure on this page is computed offline from SSA birth records with methodology decade-hub/v1.0.0, then served as a precomputed profile. Nothing is recalculated in your browser.
- Data coverage
- Decade 1910–1919; lifetime data through 2025
- Completeness
- Complete decade
- Methodology version
decade-hub/v1.0.0- Source version
ssa-national-2025- Generated
- 2026-08-14T03:32:54.323Z