Decade hub
1930s baby names
A name can be popular in the 1930s without belonging to the 1930s. This hub separates the two: the biggest names of the decade, and the names whose recorded history is concentrated inside it.
Familiar champions, era-specific ownership
The 1930s cover 1930–1939 and contain 21,229,562 recorded births: 10,663,028 girls and 10,566,534 boys, across 15,662 distinct names. Mary leads girls with 573,000 births, while Robert leads boys with 590,810. The independent D1 anchor matches the total and both champion identities and counts.
The top ten account for 19.46% of recorded births and the top hundred for 55.20%. The diversity score is 65.2624, the effective number of names is 546.58, and the concentration score is 0.6166. In this profile the national total is large, but the effective roster is smaller than in the 1910s and the distribution is relatively concentrated; those are measurements of the recorded name distribution, not proof of a historical cause.
Joan leads girls’ ownership with 173,439 decade births out of 481,238 lifetime births, a 0.360402 decade share, and an ownership score of 94.5012; it ranks seventh in popularity. Dick leads boys’ ownership with 10,163 decade births out of 29,273 lifetime births, a 0.347180 decade share, and an ownership score of 83.3452; it ranks 150th in popularity. Mary and Robert are the raw popularity champions, while Joan and Dick are more era-concentrated according to the ownership calculation.
The representative classroom is drawn from 1934 and splits evenly into 15 girls’ seats and 15 boys’ seats. All 30 names are unique, repeatedNames is 0, and the most repeated name has one seat; the stored top-share display is 0.0333. It is a deterministic classroom reconstruction from the anchor-year distribution, not a claim that every 1930s classroom had the same roster.
The strongest approved family is Catherine: Catherine (50,027), Katherine (25,193), Katharine (1,724), and Kathryn (22,583) combine to 99,527 births. Each spelling clears 1,000 births and the combined family clears 20,000; the variants are defensible spellings of the same name family. Elizabeth/Elisabeth is a close second at 97,764, while Marian/Marion totals 53,472, Eleanor/Elinor 50,141, and Sarah/Sara 54,774. Cathryn is rejected from the Catherine family at 798 births because it fails the per-variant floor.
These figures come from SSA’s national files, which suppress counts below five and record sex rather than gender; they do not include every birth or explain personal identity. The lifetime window ends at the 2025 source vintage, making ownership a revisable descriptive score rather than a timeless cultural verdict. The data support comparisons in the recorded series, not causal claims about the Depression, media, migration, or any other historical explanation.
- Girls' popularity champion
- Mary 573,000 births
- Boys' popularity champion
- Robert 590,810 births
- Total recorded births
- 21,229,562
- Female births
- 10,663,028
- Male births
- 10,566,534
- Distinct recorded names
- 15,662
- Top-10 birth share
- 19.5%
- Top-100 birth share
- 55.2%
- Diversity score
- 65.3of 100 · 547 effective names
- Concentration score
- 0.6of 100
Decade ownership
Popularity measures size. Ownership measures identity. Some names remain popular for generations. Others overwhelmingly belong to one decade. The ownership score ranks names by how concentrated their recorded history is inside 1930–1939, weighted against how visible they actually were — adjusted so that rare names cannot win on a technicality.
It is a descriptive statistic about SSA birth records, not a verdict about culture. Read the full methodology.
Girls, ranked by ownership
The 25 highest ownership scores in the female eligible set.
| Rank | Name | Ownership score | 1930s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joan | 94.5 | 173,439 | 481,238 | 36.0% | 1932 | endangered |
| 2 | Dolores | 91.6 | 77,139 | 211,440 | 36.5% | 1930 | endangered |
| 3 | Shirley | 90.7 | 229,380 | 686,383 | 33.4% | 1935 | endangered |
| 4 | Betty | 85.2 | 300,409 | 1,001,238 | 30.0% | 1930 | endangered |
| 5 | Delores | 79.5 | 37,603 | 117,821 | 31.9% | 1932 | endangered |
| 6 | Patsy | 76.7 | 36,475 | 119,448 | 30.5% | 1941 | endangered |
| 7 | Marilyn | 73.4 | 98,531 | 373,791 | 26.4% | 1947 | endangered |
| 8 | Marlene | 73.2 | 37,355 | 130,573 | 28.6% | 1936 | endangered |
| 9 | Myrna | 72.4 | 10,235 | 31,700 | 32.3% | 1938 | declining |
| 10 | Norma | 71.8 | 72,878 | 278,071 | 26.2% | 1931 | endangered |
| 11 | Pat | 71.6 | 12,463 | 40,123 | 31.1% | 1941 | extinct |
| 12 | Doris | 69.2 | 110,658 | 462,548 | 23.9% | 1928 | endangered |
| 13 | Lois | 68.4 | 80,713 | 332,950 | 24.2% | 1927 | endangered |
| 14 | Barbara | 67.0 | 296,420 | 1,436,695 | 20.6% | 1947 | endangered |
| 15 | Bettye | 67.0 | 7,051 | 22,920 | 30.8% | 1933 | extinct |
| 16 | Joyce | 67.0 | 115,506 | 509,332 | 22.7% | 1942 | endangered |
| 17 | Marlys | 65.7 | 3,172 | 8,958 | 35.4% | 1937 | declining |
| 18 | Phyllis | 65.5 | 73,805 | 322,496 | 22.9% | 1947 | endangered |
| 19 | Geraldine | 65.2 | 50,042 | 211,349 | 23.7% | 1930 | endangered |
| 20 | Arlene | 64.8 | 34,796 | 143,010 | 24.3% | 1934 | endangered |
| 21 | Wilma | 63.4 | 33,188 | 140,101 | 23.7% | 1925 | endangered |
| 22 | Carole | 63.3 | 26,768 | 110,688 | 24.2% | 1942 | endangered |
| 23 | Beverly | 62.9 | 80,846 | 378,561 | 21.4% | 1953 | endangered |
| 24 | Dorothy | 62.3 | 210,415 | 1,112,231 | 18.9% | 1924 | endangered |
| 25 | Jean | 62.0 | 94,189 | 458,436 | 20.5% | 1927 | endangered |
Boys, ranked by ownership
The 25 highest ownership scores in the male eligible set.
| Rank | Name | Ownership score | 1930s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dick | 83.3 | 10,163 | 29,273 | 34.7% | 1934 | extinct |
| 2 | Bobbie | 77.2 | 6,228 | 18,422 | 33.8% | 1931 | endangered |
| 3 | Billie | 75.4 | 9,703 | 31,637 | 30.7% | 1930 | endangered |
| 4 | Billy | 71.4 | 88,341 | 384,233 | 23.0% | 1934 | endangered |
| 5 | Donald | 70.0 | 283,718 | 1,414,824 | 20.1% | 1934 | endangered |
| 6 | Bob | 69.6 | 23,293 | 92,986 | 25.1% | 1959 | endangered |
| 7 | Bobby | 68.3 | 69,419 | 315,053 | 22.0% | 1937 | endangered |
| 8 | Gene | 66.7 | 29,313 | 126,877 | 23.1% | 1937 | endangered |
| 9 | Jimmie | 65.8 | 25,813 | 112,267 | 23.0% | 1934 | endangered |
| 10 | Don | 64.2 | 35,980 | 167,632 | 21.5% | 1946 | endangered |
| 11 | Shirley | 63.2 | 2,911 | 9,551 | 30.5% | 1935 | extinct |
| 12 | Norman | 62.0 | 49,987 | 253,160 | 19.7% | 1928 | endangered |
| 13 | Betty | 61.6 | 1,431 | 3,619 | 39.5% | 1934 | extinct |
| 14 | Gerald | 61.4 | 82,821 | 448,966 | 18.4% | 1942 | endangered |
| 15 | Lowell | 61.3 | 9,659 | 41,330 | 23.4% | 1931 | endangered |
| 16 | Eugene | 61.2 | 70,938 | 380,708 | 18.6% | 1927 | endangered |
| 17 | Bill | 60.9 | 32,338 | 160,474 | 20.2% | 1947 | endangered |
| 18 | Harold | 59.6 | 95,467 | 551,632 | 17.3% | 1924 | endangered |
| 19 | Huey | 59.5 | 2,169 | 7,098 | 30.6% | 1935 | endangered |
| 20 | Carol | 58.7 | 2,481 | 8,656 | 28.7% | 1937 | extinct |
| 21 | Carroll | 58.4 | 7,963 | 35,431 | 22.5% | 1934 | declining |
| 22 | Leroy | 57.0 | 36,255 | 200,981 | 18.0% | 1924 | endangered |
| 23 | Jackie | 56.9 | 15,678 | 78,900 | 19.9% | 1951 | endangered |
| 24 | Franklin | 56.8 | 26,381 | 141,728 | 18.6% | 1933 | stable |
| 25 | Robert | 56.1 | 590,810 | 4,849,730 | 12.2% | 1947 | endangered |
Most owned by the 1930s
Top 25 by ownership score across both sexes; each row is tagged with its sex comparison set.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1930s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joan | F | 94.5 | 173,439 | 481,238 | 36.0% | 1932 | endangered |
| 2 | Dolores | F | 91.6 | 77,139 | 211,440 | 36.5% | 1930 | endangered |
| 3 | Shirley | F | 90.7 | 229,380 | 686,383 | 33.4% | 1935 | endangered |
| 4 | Betty | F | 85.2 | 300,409 | 1,001,238 | 30.0% | 1930 | endangered |
| 1 | Dick | M | 83.3 | 10,163 | 29,273 | 34.7% | 1934 | extinct |
| 5 | Delores | F | 79.5 | 37,603 | 117,821 | 31.9% | 1932 | endangered |
| 2 | Bobbie | M | 77.2 | 6,228 | 18,422 | 33.8% | 1931 | endangered |
| 6 | Patsy | F | 76.7 | 36,475 | 119,448 | 30.5% | 1941 | endangered |
| 3 | Billie | M | 75.4 | 9,703 | 31,637 | 30.7% | 1930 | endangered |
| 7 | Marilyn | F | 73.4 | 98,531 | 373,791 | 26.4% | 1947 | endangered |
| 8 | Marlene | F | 73.2 | 37,355 | 130,573 | 28.6% | 1936 | endangered |
| 9 | Myrna | F | 72.4 | 10,235 | 31,700 | 32.3% | 1938 | declining |
| 10 | Norma | F | 71.8 | 72,878 | 278,071 | 26.2% | 1931 | endangered |
| 11 | Pat | F | 71.6 | 12,463 | 40,123 | 31.1% | 1941 | extinct |
| 4 | Billy | M | 71.4 | 88,341 | 384,233 | 23.0% | 1934 | endangered |
| 5 | Donald | M | 70.0 | 283,718 | 1,414,824 | 20.1% | 1934 | endangered |
| 6 | Bob | M | 69.6 | 23,293 | 92,986 | 25.1% | 1959 | endangered |
| 12 | Doris | F | 69.2 | 110,658 | 462,548 | 23.9% | 1928 | endangered |
| 13 | Lois | F | 68.4 | 80,713 | 332,950 | 24.2% | 1927 | endangered |
| 7 | Bobby | M | 68.3 | 69,419 | 315,053 | 22.0% | 1937 | endangered |
| 14 | Barbara | F | 67.0 | 296,420 | 1,436,695 | 20.6% | 1947 | endangered |
| 15 | Bettye | F | 67.0 | 7,051 | 22,920 | 30.8% | 1933 | extinct |
| 16 | Joyce | F | 67.0 | 115,506 | 509,332 | 22.7% | 1942 | endangered |
| 8 | Gene | M | 66.7 | 29,313 | 126,877 | 23.1% | 1937 | endangered |
| 9 | Jimmie | M | 65.8 | 25,813 | 112,267 | 23.0% | 1934 | endangered |
Most popular of the decade
Top 25 by recorded 1930–1939 births across both sexes — size only, no ownership adjustment.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1930s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | Robert | M | 56.1 | 590,810 | 4,849,730 | 12.2% | 1947 | endangered |
| 34 | Mary | F | 56.6 | 573,000 | 4,141,481 | 13.8% | 1921 | endangered |
| 46 | James | M | 52.0 | 547,479 | 5,250,638 | 10.4% | 1947 | stable |
| 67 | John | M | 49.3 | 487,950 | 5,182,633 | 9.4% | 1947 | endangered |
| 62 | William | M | 49.8 | 416,730 | 4,199,696 | 9.9% | 1947 | declining |
| 28 | Richard | M | 55.1 | 330,502 | 2,577,552 | 12.8% | 1946 | endangered |
| 32 | Charles | M | 53.9 | 303,218 | 2,434,659 | 12.5% | 1947 | stable |
| 4 | Betty | F | 85.2 | 300,409 | 1,001,238 | 30.0% | 1930 | endangered |
| 14 | Barbara | F | 67.0 | 296,420 | 1,436,695 | 20.6% | 1947 | endangered |
| 5 | Donald | M | 70.0 | 283,718 | 1,414,824 | 20.1% | 1934 | endangered |
| 3 | Shirley | F | 90.7 | 229,380 | 686,383 | 33.4% | 1935 | endangered |
| 45 | Patricia | F | 53.0 | 220,582 | 1,573,623 | 14.0% | 1951 | endangered |
| 24 | Dorothy | F | 62.3 | 210,415 | 1,112,231 | 18.9% | 1924 | endangered |
| 39 | George | M | 53.1 | 192,289 | 1,487,297 | 12.9% | 1921 | stable |
| 150 | Thomas | M | 41.8 | 183,878 | 2,358,576 | 7.8% | 1952 | stable |
| 175 | Joseph | M | 39.5 | 180,566 | 2,669,490 | 6.8% | 1956 | declining |
| 1 | Joan | F | 94.5 | 173,439 | 481,238 | 36.0% | 1932 | endangered |
| 259 | David | M | 34.2 | 164,701 | 3,676,654 | 4.5% | 1955 | endangered |
| 75 | Margaret | F | 48.5 | 157,369 | 1,264,774 | 12.4% | 1921 | endangered |
| 78 | Edward | M | 48.6 | 147,849 | 1,303,594 | 11.3% | 1924 | endangered |
| 52 | Nancy | F | 51.5 | 142,488 | 1,004,448 | 14.2% | 1947 | endangered |
| 60 | Helen | F | 50.5 | 140,426 | 1,024,202 | 13.7% | 1918 | endangered |
| 47 | Ronald | M | 51.9 | 140,332 | 1,082,247 | 13.0% | 1947 | endangered |
| 143 | Paul | M | 42.9 | 125,774 | 1,398,293 | 9.0% | 1957 | endangered |
| 124 | Kenneth | M | 44.5 | 125,111 | 1,283,974 | 9.7% | 1957 | endangered |
Popular but timeless
1930s births at or above the median of the pooled eligible set (both sexes) and adjusted concentration at or below its 25th percentile: big names whose recorded history spans many decades.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1930s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 259 | David | M | 34.2 | 164,701 | 3,676,654 | 4.5% | 1955 | endangered |
| 575 | Michael | M | 22.9 | 56,001 | 4,426,753 | 1.3% | 1957 | endangered |
| 531 | Daniel | M | 24.8 | 47,998 | 1,982,812 | 2.4% | 1985 | declining |
| 388 | Gary | M | 29.6 | 43,596 | 902,152 | 4.8% | 1952 | endangered |
| 512 | Anthony | M | 25.2 | 42,546 | 1,488,042 | 2.9% | 1990 | declining |
| 571 | Sarah | F | 24.8 | 36,513 | 1,098,498 | 3.3% | 1982 | endangered |
| 487 | Kathleen | F | 27.5 | 34,550 | 713,645 | 4.8% | 1951 | endangered |
| 481 | Samuel | M | 26.3 | 32,135 | 820,196 | 3.9% | 2001 | stable |
| 533 | Sharon | F | 26.0 | 31,083 | 723,024 | 4.3% | 1947 | endangered |
| 566 | Emma | F | 25.0 | 30,022 | 776,439 | 3.9% | 2003 | declining |
| 678 | Linda | F | 21.3 | 29,358 | 1,455,143 | 2.0% | 1947 | endangered |
| 486 | Dennis | M | 26.2 | 26,366 | 621,000 | 4.2% | 1952 | endangered |
| 461 | Douglas | M | 27.1 | 26,031 | 560,013 | 4.6% | 1957 | endangered |
| 589 | Katherine | F | 24.3 | 25,193 | 650,926 | 3.9% | 1990 | declining |
| 632 | Laura | F | 22.8 | 25,093 | 801,811 | 3.1% | 1964 | endangered |
| 628 | Andrew | M | 20.9 | 25,025 | 1,329,454 | 1.9% | 1987 | declining |
| 536 | Kathryn | F | 25.9 | 22,583 | 455,423 | 5.0% | 1952 | endangered |
| 577 | Diane | F | 24.6 | 22,198 | 518,651 | 4.3% | 1955 | endangered |
| 716 | Susan | F | 19.6 | 21,028 | 1,123,481 | 1.9% | 1955 | endangered |
| 623 | Maria | F | 23.0 | 20,640 | 566,111 | 3.6% | 1964 | stable |
| 513 | Jesse | M | 25.2 | 18,930 | 432,428 | 4.4% | 1981 | stable |
| 668 | Christine | F | 21.6 | 18,489 | 586,465 | 3.2% | 1952 | endangered |
| 615 | Patrick | M | 21.4 | 18,390 | 686,590 | 2.7% | 1964 | declining |
| 650 | Stephen | M | 20.1 | 18,272 | 864,739 | 2.1% | 1952 | endangered |
| 616 | Sara | F | 23.6 | 18,261 | 436,193 | 4.2% | 1981 | stable |
Unexpected results
Names whose popularity rank exceeds their ownership rank by 20 or more within their sex set — popular, but far less tied to the 1930s than their size suggests.
| Rank | Name | Sex | Ownership score | 1930s births | Lifetime births | Decade share of lifetime | Peak year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 105 | Dorla | F | 45.2 | 590 | 1,089 | 54.2% | 1930 | extinct |
| 225 | Dolores | M | 35.8 | 457 | 1,336 | 34.2% | 1930 | extinct |
| 155 | Doloris | F | 40.8 | 660 | 1,885 | 35.0% | 1932 | extinct |
| 286 | Verlyn | M | 33.0 | 427 | 1,432 | 29.8% | 1928 | extinct |
| 320 | Verlene | F | 33.0 | 507 | 1,874 | 27.1% | 1939 | extinct |
| 280 | Mervyn | M | 33.3 | 451 | 1,581 | 28.5% | 1937 | declining |
| 197 | Merlene | F | 38.0 | 687 | 2,379 | 28.9% | 1940 | extinct |
| 336 | Mardell | F | 32.5 | 538 | 2,170 | 24.8% | 1932 | extinct |
| 330 | Verle | M | 31.5 | 444 | 1,758 | 25.3% | 1920 | extinct |
| 349 | Inell | F | 32.1 | 527 | 2,147 | 24.5% | 1927 | extinct |
| 264 | Sherrill | M | 34.0 | 506 | 1,915 | 26.4% | 1936 | extinct |
| 298 | Merilyn | F | 33.6 | 583 | 2,317 | 25.2% | 1946 | declining |
| 314 | Beverlee | F | 33.1 | 569 | 2,297 | 24.8% | 1930 | rising |
| 309 | Erlene | F | 33.3 | 578 | 2,332 | 24.8% | 1930 | extinct |
| 253 | Earlean | F | 35.2 | 655 | 2,585 | 25.3% | 1932 | extinct |
| 298 | Virginia | M | 32.6 | 494 | 2,009 | 24.6% | 1927 | extinct |
| 352 | Dorman | M | 30.7 | 446 | 1,898 | 23.5% | 1928 | extinct |
| 390 | Arland | M | 29.5 | 415 | 1,807 | 23.0% | 1935 | stable |
| 328 | Merna | F | 32.6 | 582 | 2,461 | 23.6% | 1930 | declining |
| 282 | Derald | M | 33.2 | 528 | 2,190 | 24.1% | 1929 | extinct |
| 193 | Willene | F | 38.2 | 779 | 2,928 | 26.6% | 1929 | extinct |
| 384 | Annie | M | 29.7 | 433 | 1,927 | 22.5% | 1927 | declining |
| 289 | Elois | F | 34.0 | 637 | 2,642 | 24.1% | 1935 | extinct |
| 53 | Bobbye | F | 51.4 | 1,161 | 3,172 | 36.6% | 1931 | extinct |
| 91 | Marlyn | M | 47.3 | 819 | 2,306 | 35.5% | 1935 | declining |
The 1934 classroom
Apportion 30 seats from the actual 1934 national birth records and every seat carries a different name — no name was common enough in 1934 to guarantee a duplicate in a class of 30.
A statistical reconstruction of an average classroom, not an actual class record.
Spelling families
Conventional rankings separate spelling variants. This view groups manually reviewed variants to show their combined demographic footprint.
- Catherine family 99,527 births across 4 spellings — combined #16
- Elizabeth family 97,764 births across 2 spellings — combined #17
- Sarah family 54,774 births across 2 spellings — combined #38
- Marian family 53,472 births across 2 spellings — combined #38
- Eleanor family 50,141 births across 2 spellings — combined #38
How these numbers are made
Every figure on this page is computed offline from SSA birth records with methodology decade-hub/v1.0.0, then served as a precomputed profile. Nothing is recalculated in your browser.
- Data coverage
- Decade 1930–1939; lifetime data through 2025
- Completeness
- Complete decade
- Methodology version
decade-hub/v1.0.0- Source version
ssa-national-2025- Generated
- 2026-08-14T03:32:54.323Z